Monday, September 16, 2019
Change Management Assignment
Why did the managers at the two organizations have different ethical stances towards their customers? (Hint go to J&Jââ¬â¢s website and look at its Code of Ethics)? The key reason of two organizations having different ethical stances towards their customers appears to be that J&Jââ¬â¢s managers believed in their companyââ¬â¢s ethical values, so that when confronted with an ethical dilemma as in 1982, they consistently followed the credoââ¬â¢s rules when making business decisions. Johnson & Johnson moved immediately to protect the public even though there was little chance that any other supplies of Tylenol were contaminated and the fact that their product was defective and dangerous. At DC in contrast, managers had been just ââ¬Å"going through the motions. â⬠When push came to shove, they protected their own interests and those of their companies in illegal ways. Dow Corningââ¬â¢s managers postponed action and, to safeguard the profits of their company, but they paid the price. Within months of its decision to pull Tylenol from store shelves, however, J&J regained its status as leader in the painkiller market and has since increased its market share because of its enhanced reputation for being a highly ethical company. The behavior of Dow Corning (DC) managers seemed out of character to many people. They had widely publicized and well-developed internal ethics rules that were supposed to reign in and prevent unethical behavior. When confronted with a crisis, their ethics systems did not prevent either companyââ¬â¢s managers behaving unethically and illegally. Johnson and Johnson (J&J) also had a system of ethical rules in place. At its center is a credo describing its ethical stance toward customers, employees, and other groups. Outline a series of steps Dow Corningââ¬â¢s directors and managers should have taken to have prevented this problem? Dow Corningââ¬â¢s directors and managers should have taken series of following steps to have prevented this problem: * They should examine the nature of ethics and the source of ethical problems. * They should have had some strong internal ethical system in place to help guide them in making decisions. Had they had a system like J&J, this would have never happened. Dow Corningââ¬â¢s directors and managers should have immediately moved to protect the public / stakeholder interest * They should define rules or guidelines that companies can use to decide whether a specific business decision is ethical or unethical These rules include utilitarian, moral rights, justice, and practical rules, * They should examine the legal environment of business and describe the many kinds of laws, rules and regulations that must be followed, both at home and abroad, if a company is to do business in an honest and ethical way since ethics plays in shaping the practice of business and the life of a people, society, and nation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.